Edward Bernard Quinn, 1889
Below also see: Edward Bernard Quinn, 1904 – Indecent assault
Edward Bernard Quinn, 1904 – Indecent assault
Freeman’s Journal, Sat 2 Nov 1889 1
CATHOLIC.
———◦———
JUNIOR UNIVERSITY EXAMINATION.
————
Catholic Schools And Successful Pupils.
The list of successful pupils in connection with the late Junior Public Examination held at the University was published on Thursday. Following are the Catholic pupils who passed:—
…
Christian Bothers’ School, Balmain: Edward Bernard Quinn.
Edward Bernard Quinn, 1904 – Indecent assault
The Cooma Express, Fri 7 Oct 1904 2
QUARTER SESSIONS.
——–—
Wednesday, October 5th.
——–—
BEFORE His Honor Judge Fitzhardinge.
The following legal gentlemen were present:—Messrs Armstrong, Rose, Blaxland, Mawson, Mitchell, Neil Collins, and Edmunds.
Jas Richmond was fined £2 for non attendance as a juryman.
…
Thursday, 6th October.
…
——–
ALLEGED INDECENT ASSAULT.
William B[ernard] Quinn was charged with indecent assault on Morton B[illman] Hedger, on 10th June last at Numbla.
Accused was defended by Mr Edmunds, instructed by Mr Neil Collins.
The jury retired for 10 minutes and returned with a verdict of not guilty, and accused was discharged.
He was further charged with indecently assaulting Percy Muggridge [aka Mugridge, aged 11 years], on 2nd August, and on application of the Crown, was remanded to next Cooma Quarter Sessions. Bail was allowed, self in £100 and two in £50, or one in £100.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Manaro Mercury and Cooma and Bombala Advertiser, Fri 7 Oct 1904 3
COOMA QUARTER SESSIONS.
——–—
Wednesday, 5th October, 1904.
——–—
Before his honour Judge Fitzhardinge.
Mr W Willmott acted as Deputy Sheriff.
Crown Prosecutor, Mr J Armstrong KC.
——–—
JURORS FINED, etc.
——–—
The fine imposed on HS Baird at the last sessions was remitted. John Richmond was fined 40s for non-attendance. Alexander Haslingden was excused from attendance.
…
——–—
Thursday, 6th October, 1904.
——–—
…
CHARGE OF INDECENT ASSAULT.
——–—
Edward Bernard Quinn, a school teacher, on bail, was indicated for having on 10th June, at Numbla, indecently assaulted a boy, 9 years of age, named Morton Billman Hedger. Mr W Edmunds, instructed by Mr Neal Collins, of Sydney, defended.
Jury: WW Hassail, C Woodhouse, E Crisp, RG Allen, EH Quodling, OC Litchheld, D Clifford, FR Quodling, G Hain, AM Lloyd, GA Lloyd and CA Goodwin.
Evidence was given by the lad and nine other witnesses in support of the charge, while the accused [Edward Bernard Quinn] made a statement from the dock and called four witnesses.
Publication of the evidence in this case is withheld owing to the nature of the same.
The case lasted from 11.30 am till 5.45 pm, when the jury after a retirement of 10 minutes returned a verdict of not guilty, upon which accused was acquitted.
——–—
Another charge was then preferred against Edward Bernard Quinn, of indecently assaulting a boy named Percy Muggridge, aged 10 years. This was remanded to the next Court of Quarter Sessions, bail of self in £100, and two sureties of £50 each being allowed. Bail was forthcoming and accused was liberated.
——–—
This closed the criminal list and the court was adjourned.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Sydney Morning Herald, Fri 7 Oct 1904 4
QUARTER SESSIONS.
——
Cooma, Thursday.
The Quarter Sessions were opened yesterday before his Honor Judge Fitzhardinge, Mr Armstrong, KC, prosecuting for the Crown. Thomas Woodcraft was charged with stealing three sheep, the property of Francis Macarthur Onslow, of Tarsus station, on July 9. The accused, who was defended by Mr F Blaxland, was found guilty, and sentenced to two years’ imprisonment, and ordered find security to be of good behaviour for a further period of three years. Edward B Quinn was acquitted of a charge of assault. A similar charge against the accused was postponed till next sessions.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Daily Telegraph, Sat 8 Oct 1904 5
THE COUNTRY.
———◦———
…
Cooma, Thursday.
The local Quarter Sessions were opened yesterday, Judge Fitzhardinge presiding. Thomas Woodcroft, a farmer, living at Bunyan, five miles from Cooma, was found guilty of stealing three sheep, the property of Francis Onslow, grazier, of Tarsus, near Cooma, and was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment in Goulburn Gaol. He was also ordered to find sureties for his good behaviour for three years afterwards. The skins of the sheep were found on the accused’s premises. Expert evidence was given to the effect that the brands had been mutilated. The accused said the sheep belonged to him. Edward Bernard Quinn, who was charged with assaulting a boy aged 9, at Munbla [sic] where he was engaged as a school teacher, was acquitted.
Edward Bernard Quinn, 1904
The Cooma Express, Fri 9 Dec 1904 6
QUARTER SESSIONS.
——–—
Wednesday, December 7th, 1904.
——–—
BEFORE His Honor Judge Fitzhardinge.
Legal Gentlemen present were:—Messrs Armstrong (Crown Prosecutor). W Edmunds, Quinn, A Rose, F Blaxland, FF Mitchell, and H Dawson.
——–—
NON-ATTENDANCE AS JURORS.
John Richmond, who was fined 40/- at last Sessions, for non-attendance as a juror, gave an explanation and the fine was remitted.
HS Ryrie, EA Litchfield and EE Rouse were excused as jurymen.
WA Lang and W Cosgrove were each fined 40/- for non-attendance as jurors.
…
ALLEGED INDECENT ASSAULT.
Edwin [aka Edward] Bernard Quinn was charged with indecently assaulting one Percy Muggridge, a male person, at Numbla on November 25th, 1903. He was further charged with committing the same offence on 1st February, 1904, and again at another period 6 months later.
The accused pleaded not guilty, and was defended by Mr W Edmunds, instructed by Mr Neil Collins.
The following jury was then empanelled: JE Body (foreman), Thos Mullane, H Dyball, HF De Salis, T Plackett, J Coffey, H Bray, JA Sellar, D Jeffrey, J Blyton, J Brodie and Wm Stewart.
For the prosecution the following witnesses gave evidence:—Percy Mugridge, [sic] Morton [Billman] Hedger, Hilda Alice Hedger, Gertie Victoria Roberson [sic], and George [William] Hedger, and for the defence Ethel Kelly, Wm Kelly, Hugh Parker, Ernest Kidman and Stanley Parker. The accused [Edward Bernard Quinn] then made a statement from the dock.
As there were no questions in reply Mr Edmunds addressed the jury. He made an able address, extending over three quarters of an hour.
The Crown Prosecutor followed, after which His Honor addressed the jury.
The jury retired at ten minutes to four, and returned within five minutes with a verdict of not guilty.
——–—
Edward Bernard Quinn was then charged with indecently assaulting Morton B Hedger on 10th November, 1903. He was further charged with committing the same offence on 10th April, 1904, and again on 10th June, 1904.
Accused pleaded not guilty to the three charges, and said that he had already been acquitted on the latter one.
His Honor would not accept the plea with the rider added, and accused then pleaded not guilty.
On the application of the Crown Prosecutor the accused was committed to take his trial at any time and place directed by the Attorney General. Bail was allowed, self in £100 and two sureties of £50 each, or one of £100.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Manaro Mercury and Cooma and Bombala Advertiser, Fri 9 Dec 1904 7
COOMA QUARTER SESSIONS.
——–—
Wednesday, 7th December, 1904.
——–—
Before his Honor Judge Fitzhardinge.
Mr J Armstrong, KC prosecuted on behalf of the Crown.
——–—
JURORS FINED AND EXCUSED.
——–—
The following summoned as jurors were find £2 for non-attendance:—WA Lang and WP Cosgrove.
The fine of £2 imposed on John Richmond at the last sessions for non-attendance as a juror was remitted.
EH Litchfield and EE Rouse were excused from attendance.
——–—
CHARGE OF INDECENT ASSAULT.
——–—
Edward Bernard Quinn (on bail) was charged with having on 25th November 1903, at Numbla, indecently assaulted Percy Mugridge. Two other counts charged accused with similar assaults at different dates within six months of the first alleged offence.
Accused pleaded not guilty and was defended by Mr W Edmunds, instructed by Mr Collins, of Sydney.
Jury:—Thomas Mullane, Henry Dyball, H Fane De Salis, JE Body, T Plackett, John Coffey, Henry Bray, JA Sellar, David Jeffrey, Oliver Tindall, John Blyton, Senr, William Stewart, Junr.
The following evidence was adduced.
Percy Mugridge, deposed that he was 11 years old, and lived at Numbla with his parents. He went to school at Numbla for 6 years and accused was there as teacher for 3 or 4 years. He was not attending the school when the Departmental inquiry was on, having left a week before. Witness here described the assault. Witness was sitting down and accused was sitting down near him. Could not say when it happened; it occurred 6 or 7 times. It used to occur during school hours when they were in school. Witness gave evidence before, and remembered what he said at the police court at Dalgety.
By Mr Edmunds: The assaults took place several times before and after Christmas, all the children were in the school. They took place whilst the children were at lessons, and standing out on the floor. Accused was sitting at the table, and five others were near the table. There were two rows of forms of three each. He was sitting at the back, on the end near the passage. He had been punished for using bad words; but could not say what the bad words were. Accused punished him. Ernest Kidman and witness had a fight, and witness used the bad words mentioned. He could not say what words he was caned for.
By the Crown Prosecutor: A lot of boys were caned. He had no ill-will towards accused and had no reason on that account to bring the charge against accused.
Morton Billman Hedger, 10 years of age, deposed that he lived at Middle View, and was attending the Numbla Public School. He left a fortnight before Mr Smith, the Departmental Officer, held the enquiry. He sad near Percy Mugridge; accused sad beside Percy and assaulted him as stated. That was done several times after Christmas.
By Mr Edmunds: Witness was sitting at the end of the same form and three boys were sitting between witness and Percy. He did not see the assault on the floor of the school. Witness attended regularly. There were six in his class. Did not see anything done on the floor of the school to Percy Mugridge. Once or twice witness was caned for using bad words; he did not have a paper with bad words on it, or pass any paper with bad words on to Herbert Mugridge. Witness’s brother was caned for using bad words. He knew the the [sic] meaning of the word Counsel mentioned. His brother Herbert wrote some words, but he could not say what the words were. Herbert passed it to witness to read. His sister Hilda was 16 or 17 years of age and was going to school before Christmas, but left before the offences were committed.
Hilda Alice Hedger, aged 17, deposed that she went to Numbla Public School, and left in November, 12 months ago. Percy Mugridge was there. Witness saw accused interfere with Percy Mugridge three times before Christmas. Percy was at the desk and accused was sitting close there. Witness was sitting in the back row, and witness could see from her desk to him.
By Mr Edmunds: Edith Kelly was sitting near witness and could see Edith Kelly was sitting along to them. Witness did not see anything take place on the floor of the school with Percy Mugridge, and did not think it happened on the floor. Witness left school in November 1903, and saw it about September 1903. Could not say how long it was to the second offence, it was about 2 or 3 weeks. Accused was boarding at witness’ house till August 1904. Witness’ father and mother were living, and she had an elder and a younger sister.
Gertrude Victoria Robinson, aged 13 years, residing at little Paupong, deposed that she went for two years to Numbla school and was boarding at Mr W Mugridge’s. Percy Mugridge went to school with them, and accused was the teacher. Witness had seen Percy and the teacher at the top end near the desk sitting down, and saw accused do something. Thought it was a month before Christmas, but was not sure. Witness only saw it done once. She left school last Christmas and told Mrs Mugridge, and her mother.
By Mr Edmunds: Witness lived in the same house with Percy Mugridge. She had heard the boys using bad words. Did not tell Hugh Mugridge anything about a dream, and did not remember anything about it. Could not remember saying anything to Ernest Kidman about it. Witness used to wait for the mail, and in the cold weather they had a fire. She did not use any dirty words to Percy Mugridge. She was sitting on the form in the middle of the school.
George William Hedger, a farmer and carpenter, deposed that he lived near Numbla school. His children went there and Percy Mugridge went there also. Some of the parents saw accused on the 8th August 1903; six or seven went to him. Previous to that witness heard of complaints. Saw accused at the school about 11 o’clock, and witness was the spokeman [sic]. He told accused to come out as they wished to see him. Told him that some rumors [sic] were in circulation about his misconduct. Accused said they were false, and that no misconduct had taken place in the school. They asked accused to resign and he said “No, if I resign it will show guilt,” and he said “cannot we fix it ourselves.” Accused suggested that they hold an inquiry, and asked who would be foreman. No inquiry was held by the parents. An official inquiry was held. Witness could not say if accused had resigned, he was suspended on 20th August 1904. Accused left witness’ house on the day of the inquiry. Accused was teaching up till the morning of the inquiry. Witness told accused to leave, or he would kick him out. Accused had a room; he had his meals with the family and then went back to his room.
By Mr Edmunds: Accused was a [sic] having the meals. Mrs Hedger prepared the meals. They saw the accused, who said he would report it to the Inspector and ask him to hold an inquiry, and the parents could do the same. Accused left witness’ place, and had been at different places up to the present time.
This closed the case for the Crown.
The accused [Edward Bernard Quinn] made a statement to the effect that on 12th February 1899 he entered the Public School, and was there till 29th August 1904. He was a classified teacher and held a high certificate. He knew nothing about the charge of 19th August 1903. Hedger came to ask him to resign. Hedger said “we want you to leave the district. Hugh Mugridge said that you have been misconducting yourself with the children.” Hedger said he would report witness to the Department. Hedger said they would do what the others did. They mentioned some names and they mentioned who would preside. They wanted accused to be tried by them and to be satisfied with their decision. Witness told them to report the matter to the Inspector at Bega. They said the offences were commenced about Xmas. Witness said he would report the matter to the Inspector, and told them to do so. He wrote to Inspector Smith, and asked him to hold an inquiry. Mrs Hedger asked witness what he intended doing and he said an inquiry would be held. Mrs Hedger said that no one had made a charge against witness and that her children would not appear against him. He had his meals at Hedger’s and then retired to his room. On 29th August he received a letter to have the children ready and on that date the enquiry was held and several children made charges against accused. He was unable to get witnesses and Mr Smith suspended him. He left Hedger’s on 29th August, 1904, as he considered he did not get fair treatment. He remained in the district, and wrote to the Chief Inspector as he wished him to have a fresh inquiry. He obtained statements from several children. On 8th September he left for Sydney, and received a summons. He went to Sydney and stayed a fortnight. He was unable to obtain full information. He reserved his defence and was committed for trial to the October Sessions. The Hedger children used obscene language and told lies. He saw a piece of paper and read it, and it contained an obscene word. He punished the boy. On another occasion they went home and told lies about the accused. The children were brought and showed that they were false and they were telling lies. On another occasion accused was hampered and had trouble with the children. The children always stood some distance from the table. He denied that he misconducted himself in any way with the children. Percy Mugridge’s father was not a friend of witness’, and had reported him for leaving and going to a cricket match. Mugridge always said that the best prizes should not be given to the brightest class. Accused at one time was going to get removed, and was going to get a testimonial, and Mugridge refused to assist the movement. Mrs Hedger said she first heard it from the Robinsons, and the Robinsons said they heard it from Hedger during 1904. Hugh Mugridge had no lessons at the table. The first and second class received instructions at the table. During the five years he had been teacher he had not interfered with the children in any way.
For the defence,
Ethel Kelly, daughter of Henry Kelly deposed that she attended the Numbla School, and left in July 1904. At school she sat on the back form, but not in any particular place. Percy Mugridge sat on the end of the back form. Witness could see what went on as well as Hilda Hedger, and never saw accused misconduct himself. They used to have geography in one class on the floor of the school. Witness never never [sic] saw Percy Mugridge out by himself.
By the Crown Prosecutor: Hilda Hedger was older than witness. The latter was 10 years at school; she had a younger sister and brother; went to school irregularly.
William Kelly, aged 14, deposed he went to school at Numbla, and sat on the same side as Percy Mugridge at the back desk. Four sat on the same form. Witness was in the fourth class. Witness had never seen any misconduct between accused and Percy Mugridge. He did not see Percy Mugridge on the floor this year. Had heard boys using bad words.
Edith Kelly, aged 12, deposed that she went to the school at Numbla and was in the third class; Percy Mugridge was in the same class. Witness used to sit on the middle form, and Percy Mugridge sat behind her, and Percy Robinson was in front of her. Four sat on her form. She never saw anything improper between accused and Percy Mugridge. Constable Clarke called on her.
By the Crown Prosecutor: Witness went to school nearly every day; about 22 went to the school. He never saw accused and Percy Mugridge sitting at any time together. Witness lived three miles from the school. She did not mind the children; she used to be sick and could not go to school.
Hugh Parker, 10 years of age, deposed that he attended the Numbla Public School for one year and eight months. He sat at the front desk, from the table, and Percy Mugridge sat on the back form. He went to school regularly and never saw any improper conduct. If accused sat near Percy Mugridge witness could have seen it. He saw Percy Mugridge out on the floor at times with other children. He remembered before the inquiry, and heard Percy Mugridge and others saying what they intended to state.
Ernest Kidman, aged 14 years, living at Grose’s Plain said he attended Numbla School up to December 1903. He was generally next to Percy Mugridge, and never saw any improper conduct with accused and Percy Mugridge. Sometimes he heard Percy Mugridge using bad language. He knew the girl Robinson and they they [sic] were waiting for the mail. Walter Mugridge was there also. Witness heard Percy Mugridge use obscene language.
By the Crown Prosecutor: Witness used bad words sometimes. He left school on 18th August, 1903.
Stanley Parker, 9 years old, stated he attended Numbla Public School nearly every day. He lived three miles away. He sat at the front desk and Hugh, his brother, sat behind him. He knew Percy Mugridge and never saw anything wrong with Percy Mugridge and the accused. He knew where the table was.
This closed the case.
The jury retired, and after an absence of seven minutes returned with a verdict of not guilty.
———
Edward Bernard Quinn was then indicted for having, on 10th November, 1903, at Numbla, indecently assaulted Morton Bowman Hedger. Other counts charged accused with having committed the offence on 10th April and 10th June last.
Accused pleaded not guilty, and autrefois acquit. [Formerly acquitted].
His Honor remanded accused till the next Court of Quarter Sessions, bail of self of £100 and two sureties of £50 each was allowed.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Sydney Morning Herald, Fri 9 Dec 1904 8
QUARTER SESSIONS.
——
Cooma, Wednesday.
The Quarter Sessions opened this morning before his Honor Judge Fitzhardinge. Mr Armstrong was Crown Prosecutor. Thomas O’Brien was charged with assaulting a child under the age of 10 years at Sutton, near Queanbeyan. The Crown accepted a plea pf guilty on the minor count, and the prisoner was sentenced to three years’ penal servitude. William Henry Clarke pleaded guilty to two charges of obtaining money and goods under false pretences by purporting to be an insurance agent. Accused, who had refunded the money and the value of the goods, was sentenced to six months’ imprisonment on each indictment, the sentence being suspended under the Crimes Act . Arthur Samuel Ford, who pleaded guilty to breaking and entering JC Russell’s shop, and to a second account of stealing clothing there from, was sentenced to six months’ hard labour on each count, the sentence to be concurrent. Edward Burnard [sic] Quinn, a school teacher, remanded from last sessions, charged with having committed an assault upon a boy at Numbla, Dalgety, was acquitted. On a second similar charge he was remanded to the next sessions.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Sydney Morning Herald, Mon 26 Dec 1904 9
COUNTRY NEWS.
———◦———
…
Cooma, Saturday.
The clerk of petty sessions has received a notification from the Department of Justice stating that the Attorney-General has decided that no further proceedings shall be taken against Edward Bernard Quinn, who was remanded from the last Cooma sessions on a charge of assault.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Queanbeyan Age, Fri 30 Dec 1904 10
LOCAL AND GENERAL.
A HAPPY NEW YEAR TO ALL.
…
The Attorney General has declined to take any further proceedings against Edward Bernard Quinn, who was remanded from last Cooma Sessions on a charge of assault.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Dismissal of teacher, Edward Bernard Quinn, Mar 1905 11
1
Minute Paper for the Executive Council.
No. 84.
Department of Public Instruction,
Sydney, 6th March 1905.
1905/11105.
NUMBLA:__DISMISSAL OF TEACHER, MR EDWARD B QUINN.
I submit, for the approval of His Excellency the Governor-in-Council, upon the recommendation of the Public Service Board, that, for the reasons set forth in the accompanying papers, Mr Edward B Quinn, teacher of the Public School at Numbla, be dismissed from the Public Service, as from the 31st August, 1904.
2
No. 05/1692.
Public Service Board,
50, Young-street, Sydney,
28th February 1905.
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION.
Recommendation dismissal of Mr EB Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla.
————
Photo ID: SRNSW 4481_a026_000303.jpg
On the 3rd September 1904, the permanent head of the Department of Public Instruction reported to the Public Service Board that he had suspended Mr EB Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla, upon charges of being guilty of grossly immoral conduct towards the pupils under his charge, and of misconduct in writing an immoral letter.
Before taking any action in regard to inquiring into the charges, the Board decided to refer the papers to the Honourable the Attorney-General for decision as to whether a criminal prosecution should be instituted. It having been decided that such proceedings should be taken no further steps were taken by the Board pending the result of the trial. Mr Quinn having been acquitted, the Board, acting on the Crown Solicitor’s advice, called upon him, on 30th November 1904, in terms of Section 56 of the “Public Service Act , 1902”, to state whether he admitted the truth of the charges made against him. In his letter in reply, dated 29th December last, Mr Quinn denied portion of the charges, but admitted having written the letter referred to therein.
3
During December he was tried a second time on another charge similar to that at the first trial, and again acquitted.
Despite the fact that Mr Quinn has been found not guilty of the criminal offences alleged against him, it is clear from the letter (with these papers) which he admitted having written, that he is a man quite unfit to be a teacher of young children and, under all the circumstances of the case, the Board feel it their duty to recommend for the approval of His Excellency the Governor and the Executive Council that he be dismissed the Public Service, as from 31st August 1904.
[Signatures illegible] Members of the Public Service Board.
4
In the State of New South Wales
TO WIT. }
To J McCredie Esq Acting Under-Secretary Department of Public Instruction Sydney
You are hereby commanded that all business being laid aside, and all excuses ceasing, you be and appear in your proper person before the Court of General Quarter Sessions of the Peace, at Cooma in the State of New South Wales, on Wednesday the 7th day of December 1904 at the hour of ten o’clock in the forenoon of the same day, to testify the truth and give evidence on behalf of the defendant in the case of indecent assault against Edward B Quinn and that you bring with you and produce at the time and place aforesaid the roll books, punishment book and timetable of the Public (or provisions) School number for the period October 1903 to August 1904 also evidence given at inquiry held by Mr Inspector Smith at Public School Numbla on or about 29 August 1904 and that you so appear from day to day until the case be tried and that you depart not without leave of the Court, under the penalty of £100. And this you are in no wise to omit.
Given under my hand, at Sydney in the said State this 30th day of November in the year of Our Lord one thousand nine hundred and four.
[Signed] AR Witby, Deputy Clerk of the Peace.
Neil Collins, Defendant’s Attorney, 81 Elizabeth-street
5
Numbla.
Office of the Clerk of the Peace,
Sydney, 23rd December 1904.
The King v Edward B Quinn.
————
I have the honour to return herewith the file of papers obtained from your Department in connection with the inquiry into the conduct of the above named EB Quinn (late school teacher at Numbla).
The Attorney-General has declined to further proceed against the accused, and the papers will therefore not be further required by me.
I have the honour to be,
Sir
your obedient servant.
[Signed] WR Beaver, Clerk of the Peace.
The Under-Secretary, Department of Public Instruction.
6
Numbla.
Inspector A Smith.
For report.
5.1.5.
Shortly the history of this case is as follows:—An inquiry into conduct of teacher was held on the 29th August last. Prior to inquiry the teacher handed me the letter appended, saying “This is my resignation.” At the close of the inquiry the teacher was suspended. Subsequently the teacher was charged at the police court with indecent assault, committed for trial, tried on two occasions on separate indictments and acquitted. At the second trial Judge Fitzhardinge summed up strongly adverse to the accused. It would appear from the papers that Quinn was paid salary to the 31st August the date of resignation.
As the simplest and quietest method of getting rid of an undesirable man I recommend that the resignation of Mr Edward B Quinn be accepted. As from the (1st September) last 31st August.
5.1.5. [Initialled] AS.
7
No 04/10132.
Public Service Board,
50, Young-street, Sydney,
16th September, 1904
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT:
Suspension of Mr EB Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety.
————
With reference to the papers forwarded by you notifying the suspension on the 29th August ,ultimo, of Mr EB Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety, for being guilty of grossly immoral conduct, I have the honour to inform you that the Board, before taking action under the provisions of the Public Service Act , referred the papers to the honourable the Attorney-General, with a view to his considering whether he would direct that criminal proceedings should be instituted.
The Crown Solicitor has now informed the Board that the Honourable the Attorney-General has advised that criminal proceedings should be instituted, and the papers have therefore been forwarded with a view to the necessary steps being taken.
[Signed] JW Holliman, Secretary.
The Acting Secretary, Department of Public Instruction.
8
Numbla.
Inspector A Smith,
The evidence given at the inquiry held by you at Numbla, on the 29th August, and the immoral letter—written by Mr Quinn are at the Justice Department—and arrangements have been made for the Crown to produce them. As already instructed by wire you should be at the Court on the 7th instant and represent the Department.
5th December 1904
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
For Under-Secretary.
Chief Inspector.
I attended the Cooma Quarter Sessions today Mr Quinn was acquitted but has been arraigned on another similar charge.
7.12.4 [Initials] AS.
9
ED Quinn alleged indecency Numbla Dalgety.
No 04/10132.
Public Service Board,
50, Young-street, Sydney,
16 September, 1904.
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT.
Suspension of Mr ED Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety.
————
The Public Service Board having noted the decision of the Honourable the Attorney General in the above matter, the papers are now returned with a view to the necessary steps being taken.
[Signed] JW Holliman, Secretary.
The Crown Solicitor, Sydney.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Forwarded to the Inspector General of Police for the necessary action. I have been informed that two summonses for indecent assault upon Morton B Hedger and Percy Muggeridge respectively were taken out (presumably by the parents) on the 8th instant returnable on the 21st instant the result of which might be first awaited.
[Signed] James Tillett, Crown Solicitor, 19.9.04.
The Inspector-General of Police.
10
No 04/9773.
Public Service Board,
50, Young-street, Sydney,
8th September, 1904.
PUBLIC INSTRUCTION DEPARTMENT:
Suspension of Mr ED Quinn, teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety:
————
The Acting Under-Secretary for Public Instruction, reports the suspension, under the provisions of the Public Service Act , of Mr ED Quinn, Teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety, for being guilty of grossly immoral conduct towards the pupils in his charge.
In view, however, of the circumstances of the case, as disclosed in the papers, the Board considers it desirable, before taking action under the Public Service Act, that the matter should be referred for consideration to the Honourable the Attorney-General, with a view to his considering whether he will direct that a criminal prosecution be instituted.
[Signed] JW Holliman, Secretary.
The Crown Solicitor, Sydney.
11
Numbla Inquiry.
Report.
An inquiry was held at the school on Monday the 29th instant the parties concerned having received ample notice. Before commencing the inquiry Mr Quinn the Teacher handed me his resignation which is appended. Generally the charges preferred against the teacher were:—(1) Teaching pupils the habit of self abuse, (2) Indecently exposing his person to the pupils.
It having come to the knowledge of 6 fathers of children attending this school that the Teacher was indulging in indecent practices with the pupils these 6 formed a deputation and waited upon the Teacher, vaguely hinted that something was wrong and asked him to resign. The Teacher refused until he knew the charges, and suggested holding an inquiry straight away, but as they disagreed as to who should be “judge” the proposal fell through and both parties wrote asking me to hold an inquiry. It is evident that the Teacher wanted to hold a preliminary investigation himself and failing that, desired to retain the pupils until I held the inquiry; but all the pupils except four were withdrawn from the school.
12
Looking at the evidence appended it will be seen that the following damaging statements were made against the Teacher, viz,
Morton B Hedger said that Mr Quinn put his hand into his (Hedger’s) trousers and took hold of his little thing and rubbed it up and down; that Mr Quinn unbuttoned his own trousers and pulled out his penis asking him (Hedger) what it was and what the round things were. Hedger also said that he felt the round things and the other thing too and rubbed it as Quinn had rubbed his. This witness gives other instances of similar misconduct.
Herbert E Hedger states that Quinn during the dinner hour took his (Hedger’s) hand and put it on the fork of his (Quinn’s) trousers feeling not only the trousers but the thing between his legs.
Gertrude Robertson said she saw the teacher feeling Morton Hedger in his private parts.
Eliza Mary Preston said that she saw the Teacher doing dirty things to the boys; he took put his hand into their trousers and kept it there for a time.
Walter Mugridge said he had seen Mr Quinn take hold of a boy’s hand and put it inside his (Quinn’s) trousers for a short time.
13
Percy Mugridge said that he saw Mr Quinn put his hand into the trousers of Morton Hedger and Hugh Mugridge and again that he had seen Quinn catch boys by the hand and put their hands into his (Quinn’s) trousers. Further he stated that Quinn took his (Mugridge’s) hand and put it inside of his (Quinn’s) trousers and he felt his “pee-wee”.
Morton Hedger was recalled. Mr Quinn explained to me privately that he (Quinn) had been circumcised and he wanted to test the veracity of Morton Hedger so I asked him at Quinn’s request to describe the appearance of Mr Quinn’s penis. When it was shown to him. In effect it Hedger’s answer was, that though limp it had a bold head.
Amelia Girvan said she saw the Teacher with his hand in her brother Ray’s trousers while Raymond Girvan corroborated this statement.
Florence Mugridge a cousin of the brothers of that surname said she saw the Teacher’s trousers unbuttoned and a boy’s hand inside his (Quinn’s) trousers.
The disgusting practices here related are said to have happened some time during the dinner hour sometimes after school but generally
14
they were indulged in during the ordinary school work. When each incriminating statement was read over to Mr Quinn, he declared it to be false. His defence was that the children had bad minds and they had imagined the things they said. In my opinion the evidence of the Teacher’s guilt is overwhelming and I believe the abominable practices have been going on during the past twelve months. At the last inspection six months ago I noticed a great deterioration in the work of the pupils and in the general management of the school and recommended drastic measures. After I had taken Mr Quinn’s statement Mr Hedger handed me an unfinished letter stating that he had picked it up. As it reflected on members of his family he wished it returned. Mr Quinn claimed it as his property. I, therefore, made a careful copy of the letter and handed the original in Quinn’s handwriting to Mr Hedger. The writing Quinn acknowledged to be his. This letter shows the debased character of Quinn who there speaks of two of Hedger’s daughters 2 bright modest pupils when I examined the school two years ago. He almost gloats
15
on the possibility of their falling a prey to some low scoundrel a boon companion of his own. Quinn showed this base treachery to the house that had nourished him during his stay at Numbla.
At the conclusion of the inquiry I suspended Edward B Quinn.
I recommend that Mr Edward B Quinn’s suspension be upheld and his case referred to the Public Service Board to be dealt with under the regulations.
Numbla, 30.8.4.
[Signed] A Smith.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Acting Under-Secretary, I concur
2.9.04 [Initialled] JWH.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The first intimation of this teacher’s suspension on the 29th August was received by me today (3.9.04) and his alary to the 31st August inclusive has already been paid.
[Initial illegible], Accountant, 3.9.4.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
The Public Service Board.
I have suspended this teacher to take effect as from the 29th August ultimo, and append a copy of the letter of suspension. The papers are now forwarded for necessary action and in view of the very serious nature of the case, I suggest that it be dealt with as urgent.
3.9.4.
[Initialled], JWH, Under Secretary.
16
New South Wales Post and Telegraph.
Telegram.
Bombala 16 9d
Chief Inspr,
Instruction,
Sydney
Report on Quin [sic] Case Numbla posted should reach you Friday morning.
[Signed] Smith
17
Numbla.
Reporting having suspended teacher Mr Quinn.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
New South Wales Post and Telegraph.
State and Interstate Line.
Telegram from Cooma Station.
Addressed to Chief Superintendent Instruction, Sydney
As the result of investigation have suspended Quinn the Teacher Numbla.
(Signed) Smith
Address Inspr.
18
No 1904/19699
Department of Public Instruction,
Sydney, 3rd September 1904.
Memorandum to Mr Edward B Quinn,
Teacher of the Public School at Numbla, Dalgety.
Address to Alma, Dalgety.
Your suspension from duty.
I hereby suspend you from duty as a Teacher under this department, in confirmation of Mr Inspector A Smith’s action, to take effect from the 29th August ultimo, for being guilty of grossly immoral conduct towards the pupils under your charge, and for your conduct in writing an immoral letter.
The papers in the case have been referred to the Public Service Board.
(signed) F Bridges,
Acting Under Secretary.
19
Numbla.
New South Wales Post and Telegraph.
State and Interstate Lines.
Telegram from Cathcart Station
Addressed to Chief Inspector, Instruction, Sydney
Teacher Numbla School can produce class rolls punishment books timetables wanted for Quarter Sessions Cooma
(signed) Smith.
20
Public School,
Numbla Dalgety,
August 26th 04
The Chief Inspector
DPI, Sydney.
Dear Sir,
I have the honour to inform you that it is my intention to resign my position as a Teacher under the Department of Public Instruction of this State from the 1st proximo. I have the honour to be,
Yours obediently,
[Signed] Edward B Quinn.
Photo: Peter de Waal
21
Numbla:
Complaining of the Teacher’s conduct.
August 18th 04
Middle View
Dalgety
Mr Inspector Smith, MA, Bega
Dear Sir
I will ask you on behalf of the parents to come up and hold an investigation at Numbla public School with reference to complaints made by the Children of certain conduct carried on at the school, and all the children are withdrawn from the school except four do please come as soon as possible and oblige.
Yours faithfully,
[Signed] GW Hedger, farmer
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Received and acknowledged by telegram 25.8.04.
[Initialled] AS.
22
Numbla
Asking for an inquiry with charges of misconduct.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Public School,
Numbla Dalgety,
August 15th 04.
Dear Sir,
A number of the parents waited on me this morning asking me to obtain a removal from this school resign owing to “misconduct.” I would be glad if you would come at once to hold an inquiry.
[Signed] Edward B Quinn, Teacher.
Mr A Smith BA, Inspector, Bega.
15.8.04.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Received and acknowledged by telegram 25.8.4.
23
Numbla
Evidence taken at inquiry
29.8.4.
George William Hedger (adult) states:—
I am the father of Herbert Edward Hedger and Morton Billman Hedger, who are pupils attending this school.
Herbert told his mother about February certain statements; but I did not hear these myself till about four weeks ago.
My wife then told me of certain misconduct on the part of the Teacher.
I questioned Herbert. Herbert said Mr Quinn the Teacher caught him twice by the fly of his trousers, and tried to put his hand inside.
I then questioned Morton who said that Mr Quinn had opened his, Morton’s, trousers and put his hand on his person; that he then caught hold of Morton’s hand and put it inside of Mr Quinn’s trousers; that going home a few weeks ago, Mr Quinn had done something similar to him (Morton) I did not then speak to Mr Quinn about the alleged misconduct, but asked some of the parents whether they had heard of any “misconduct” on the part of the teacher. On the 15th instant accompanied by five other fathers of children attending this school I called at the school about 10 o’clock
24
and had a conversation with the Teacher in the weathershed. I was spokesman at the request of the others. I told Mr Quinn there were certain reports circulated by some of the children about him, and asked him to resign. Mr Quinn said that it wouldn’t be fair unless he knew the nature of the reports, and asked if we couldn’t settle it among ourselves by holding an inquiry. Asking the children so that he might know what he was being charged with. We thought over the matter and decided to ask the Inspector to hold the investigation. I waited a few days to see what Mr Quinn would do and then wrote the letter attached. I was not satisfied merely with the statements of my own children, and Mr Quinn had been boarding with my family up till today.
By Mr Quinn: A certain document belonging to you came into my possession. It was by Mr Quinn a letter. I have not the letter here but can get it. This letter during the conversation on the 15th inst was referred to by you.
You propose to question the pupils and if there was any prima face case against you to report the matter to the Inspector. I was not agreeable to that course.
25
Had the other parents been agreeable to allow their children to remain at school until a Departmental investigation had been held I would have done so. I told you that night then to clear out of my house or I would kick you out. You said you paid your board by the week and would continue at my house till the week was up.
George William Hedger Jnr, Morton Billman Hedger state:
I shall be seven years old in December next, and am a pupil attending this school. About the beginning of this year, I was kept in one afternoon for not knowing my lesson, and sat on the back form. While I sat there Mr Quinn put his hand into my trousers and caught hold of my little thing and rubbed it up and down for about a quarter of an hour.
Mr Quinn then unbuttoned his own trousers and pulled his “thing” out and asked me what it was, and what the round things were.
I felt the round things and the other too, and rubbed his as he had rubbed mine for nine or ten minutes until the Teacher told me to stop
26
I did not notice anything coming out of the Teacher’s thing when I stopped.
Since the June holidays Mr Quinn again one afternoon when I was kept in pulled my thing out of the little hole and rubbed it for 3 or 4 minutes stopping without my asking. On the 10th of June again Mr Quinn sitting on a chair near the fire while I stood up caught hold of my thing that I had withdrawn from the hole of my trousers and rubbed it as before. About five weeks ago I was in the back desk after school being kept in when the teacher told me to rub and I did rub it for about 10 minutes the Teacher looking on the whole time.
By Mr Quinn: On the 10th June you called me back and gave me a message to my mother. You then asked me to come in and have a feel.
[Signed] Mr WB Hedger.
Herbert Edward Hedger states:—
I am a twin brother of Morton Hedger and attend this school.
About March last I was kept in one dinner time; Bill Kelly and Walter Mugridge were also kept in. I sat in the back seat; Bill Kelly and W Mugridge sat on the front form in front of me. Mr Quinn came up
27
to me, took my hand and put it on the fork of his trousers.
Besides the trousers I felt the thing between his legs. Once since Mr Quinn took my hand and put it on the front of his trousers and I felt his thing as before. Mr Quinn never interfered with my person nor have I played with it myself.
By Quinn. You kept me in once without my dinner, and I told my mother. No one told me to say what I have said. I remember you caning me across your knee for using dirty words.
[Signed] Herbert E Hedger.
Gertrude Roberson states:—
I shall be 14 years old next February and was a pupil at the school till the last Christmas Vacation. I boarded with Mrs W Mugridge. About November last I saw the Teacher feeling Morton Hedger on his private parts.
I sat in the front seat and Morton Hedger in the back seat, and turning around saw the Teacher sitting beside Morton Hedger, feeling him in the private parts for about five minutes. I did not look the whole time but turned round occasionally. That was the only occasion when I saw wrongdoing on the part of the Teacher. When my mother who lives five miles away came
28
to take me home for the holidays I told her. I did not return to school after the Christmas Vacation because I had nowhere to board.
To Mr Quinn: I have not spoken of this to anyone recently. I did not hear children remark that you were a scotty Teacher. I did not tell anyone last year we were going to get another Teacher.
[Signed] Gertrude Roberson.
Eliza Mary Preston states:—
I was 9 years old last April. I am a cousin of Gertrude Robertson’s I left this school in December last. Shortly before that time I saw the Teacher doing dirty things to the boys. The Teacher sat on a chair on one occasion with a boy (Morton Hedger) in front of him. Mr Quinn put his hand into the boy’s trousers and kept it there for a little while. I saw Mr Quinn doing that with other boys. When these acts were done I told Mrs Hedger with whom I was staying.
[Signed] Eliza Mary Preston.
Walter Mugridge states:—
I shall be 13 years in September next, and have been a pupil of this school until the last two weeks.
29
While other children were in the room I have seen Mr Quinn take hold of the boy’s hand and put it inside of his (Mr Quinn’s) trousers for a short time. About 3 months ago during school hours I was standing up near the table while Mr Quinn was sitting down. He took my hand and put it on the fly of his trousers, and kept it there for a little while.
By Mr Quinn: I heard Gerty Robertson say that she was sick of Mr Quinn and that her sister was going to send in for a lady teacher.
By Inspector: I liked Mr Quinn very well.
[Signed] Walter Mugridge.
Percy Mugridge states:—
I am 11½ years old and attend this school up till a fortnight ago. Early this year I saw Mr Quinn put his hand into the trousers of Morton Hedger and Hugh Mugridge. These boys were sitting in the same seat with myself. While this conduct was going on, when boys have been standing round the table, I have seen Mr Quinn catch boys them by the hand
30
and put them in me at a time into his trousers. About five weeks ago I was sitting on a form during school hours, with Mr Quinn sitting beside me. Mr Quinn took my hand and put it inside his trousers and I felt his “pee-pee”. I then drew my hand away.
By Mr Quinn: When boys were at the table you were showing them how to do sums. While sitting on the forms we were drawing. Told my mother in answer to her inquiries what I have now said.
[Signed] Percy Mugridge.
Morton B Hedger recalled (by Mr Quin).
I had a good look at your thing. It was limpy when I saw it and the skin was pulled back.
You have told me to knock at my your door in the morning instead of rushing in to waken you.
[Signed] MB Hedger.
Amelia Girvan states:—
I was 14 years old last June, and was attending school until a fortnight ago. I am a cousin the Mugeridges. I sit in the front seat when attending school. One day when turning round I saw Mr Quinn in the back seat sitting down.
31
He was sitting beside my brother Raymond Girvan fooling with him. The Teacher had his hand in Ray’s trousers near the fork. When I saw it I turned by head away. I saw the Teacher doing the same to Morton Hedger. The Teacher never said or did anything improper to me.
By Mr Quinn: Before I saw you fooling with the boys I heard Hilda Hedger say you did things like that. I am sure you did the things I mentioned.
[Signed] Amelia Girvan.
Raymond Girvan states:—
I am 10 years old, and have attended this school till a fortnight ago. Two weeks before I left school I was sitting in the back seat drawing. Mr Quinn came up and sat beside me. He put his finger through the fly of my pants and touched my leg near the fork. The Teacher did not do this at any other time, and have not seen other boys served in that way.
By Mr Quinn: I have heard Morton Hedger say that the Teacher did the same to him. I am sure you did that to me, and no one told me to say this. My parents did not ask me about, nor did I tell them.
[Signed] Raymond Girvan.
32
Florence Mugridge 12 years 5 months states: I attend this school up till 2 weeks ago.
About 6 months ago I was sitting in the front seat; the teacher was in the back seat sitting down with the boys. The Teacher’s trousers were unbuttoned and a boy’s hand was inside the trousers. I saw this when I looked round and immediately looked away again. I am a cousin of Walter Mugridge and Percy Mugridge.
By Mr Quinn: I really saw what I have stated, and have not been told to say what I have said. When I saw the misconduct I did not mention it to mother or father; but about a fortnight ago I told my mother in answer to her question.
[Signed] Florence Mugridge.
Hugh Parker 10 years old states: I am a pupil of this school. I have not seen Mr Quinn at any time misconduct himself. I sit in the middle seat of the second block. No one has asked me to say what I have.
[Signed] Hughie Parker.
33
Edward Bernard Quinn states:—
I am the Teacher of this school and took charge in February 1900. I have heard the statement of Morton Hedger. It is absolutely false. There is nothing in the statement of Herbert Hedger. The statement of Gertrude Robertson is untrue. The statement of Eliza Mary Preston is untrue. There is no truth in the statement of Percy Mugridge.
The statement of Amelia Girvan is false. The statement of Raymond Girvan is untrue. Statement of Florence Mugridge is untrue.
I don’t know any reason or motive why Morton Hedger has made damaging statements against me. Morton Hedger was caned twice this year according to Punishment Book. Herbert Hedger was caned severely on the 16th April.
On the 15th instant while teaching I was called out of school by Mr Hedger and went to the weather shed where I found 5 other men. Mr Hedger said there were 5 or 6 other parents there and they have come to ask me to resign. I asked them to give their reasons. Their answer was that their children had been spreading reports
34
I asked them what the reports were and there was no answer. I said they could not expect me to resign unless I knew the charges. Mr A Mugridge then said something that implied misconduct on my part. I asked with whom? Mr Hedger replied with a number of school children. I said if you think there is anything wrong call the children and hold an inquiry among yourselves. One said who would be judge? I was then asked if I would go by the verdict then arrived at and I said “No, if you think there is a case against me send it on to the Inspector.”
All the parents present that day withdrew their children. I often sat beside my pupils to assist them in their work. I may have placed my hand on the legs of children but never indecently.
[Signed] Edward B Quinn.
35
Numbla
Copy of an unfinished letter acknowledged by Mr Quinn to be in his handwriting, picked up by Mr Hedger or one of his family.
Mr Hedger allowed me to made a copy of it on the understanding that I return it to him:—
“Dear Charlie,
No you are making a big bloomer when you get talking in that style. At present only the two youngest are at home and I don’t consider it worthwhile to try them. I look upon them as kids. Others who strike the house take a different view from myself. The girls are just now of an age when a little squeezing and tickling is sufficient to do the trick. A party could ride the arse of them. I was coming from my room a short time back and saw a bloke kissing and pulling one of them about. The best of it is he is married and has a reputation of having several little bastards about the country.
I know for certain that once he gets an opportunity, he will leave a bird in one of their cages. I would
36
be sorry for the old people but it is their lookout to watch after their kids closer especially girls in a case like this is. Of course I can’t say anything as you can see and moreover we are not on the best of terms. The bloke and I are the best of chums and have very few secrets from one another. He brings me my chaff so of course is often calling and sees them.”
37
Numbla:
Alma; Dalgety.
September 1st 1904
The Chief Inspector, Sydney.
Dear Sir,
I have the honour to beg of you to postpone your decision for a week or ten days in my case in which I was charged with misconduct and upon which Mr Inspector Smith recently held an inquiry. My reason for asking is that new facts have recently come to light and I am busy collecting evidence on them. This is delayed owing to the fathers of the children being absent from the home during the day and the only time I can see them is at night.
I have the honor to be
Yours obediently.
[Signed] Edward B Quinn.
38
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION.
————
COPY OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION.
————
YOUR SUSPENSION FROM DUTY.
I hereby suspend you from duty as a Teacher under this Department, in confirmation of Mr Inspector A Smith’s action, to take effect from the 29th August ultimo, for being guilty of grossly immoral conduct towards the pupils under your charge, and for your conduct in writing an immoral letter.
The papers in the case have been referred to the Public Service Board.
(signed) F Bridges.
Acting Under Secretary.
39
No 05/23
Public Service Board,
50, Young-street, Sydney,
13th January, 1905.
Suspension of Mr EB Quinn, Teacher, Public School, Numbla, Dalgety.
————————
With reference to your communication of the 21st November last intimating that Mr EB Quinn, Teacher Public School, Numbla, Dalgety, had been tried at the Cooma Quarter Sessions, and acquitted of the charge made against him, I am directed to inform you that the Public Service Board understand that Mr Quinn has since been tried on a second charge, viz on7 December, and will be glad if you will kindly inform them what was the result of the trial. Mr Quinn has written stating that he was acquitted.
[Signed] JW Holliman, Secretary.
The Crown Solicitor.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Quinn was tried for the second time at Cooma Quarter Sessions in December last, and acquitted.
40
There were other charges against him, and on these the Attorney-General under all the circumstances directed that no further proceedings should be taken. I ought to add that the Crown Prosecutor in recommending the Attorney General to abandon the other charges drew attention to the fact that Quinn had, before the commencement of the prosecutions, resigned his position under the Public Instruction Department, and stated that it had been otherwise he would have strongly recommended that Quinn should be removed from his position as being a person wholly unfit, both from his conduct and the tone of the letter which he had written, to be a public school teacher.
The Crown Prosecutor also expressed the hope that Quinn would never again be employed by the Department.
[Signed] WR Beaver, Clerk of the Peace, 17:1:05.
The Crown Solicitor.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Forwarded for the information of the Public Service Board.
[Signed] JV Tillett, Crown Solicitor, 18/1/05.
41
158 Thomas Street,
Sydney,
29.12.04
Sir
In reference to your letter of the 30th instant I have the honour to place before you the following.
I deny absolutely that I ever at any time misconducted myself in any way with any of the children under my charge.
The first I heard of the charges was on the 15th of August last. On that day several of the parents came to the school; Hedger told me I was wanted in the weathershed. I went with him and he said that “they had come to ask me to resign.” I asked “For what?” but received no answer. I again asked the reason and Hedger said “Oh we don’t want to make any charge against you. We want you to leave the place quietly and there will be nothing more about it.” “About what”, I asked. “If you want me to resign and leave the district you must have some reason.” Mugridge then replied that “I had been misconducting myself with the children.” I asked “What children?” and the reply was all of them. I answered that “I had done no such thing” and demanded that the children be brought before me: This they refused to do. Mugridge then said something about a deadlock. I said yes as far as my resigning is concerned. You have come here made an accusation against me and won’t give me a chance to disprove it and want me to resign. “Oh well if you won’t do that we shall report you”, said Hedger. I said
42
allright that is the proper thing to do. Mugridge then said he would withdraw his children from the school. I asked when did the alleged misconduct take place to which Mugridge replied they could not give any dates as children could not remember them. I said “Can’t you give me some idea,” and Hedger replied “Since before Christmas.” I asked why they had not taken action before, but no one made any reply. I asked each of them if their children had made any complaints and four of them said “No”. I again asked the parents to bring the children forward and let them make their complaints before me. Mugridge asked if I would agree to what the parents decided. I said “No, but if they believed the charges they should send them on to the Inspector:” to this they would not agree. I then asked the parents what they intended doing and if they still meant to withdraw their children from the school. Some of them said they would do as the others did. Mugridge said he had already given his decision so I called the children out of school and sent them home. I told the parents I would write to the Inspector and advise one of them to do the same. The parents then left.
That afternoon I spoke to Mrs Hedger of the charges and she said you know none of my children will appear against you. The next day as I was preparing to go out Mrs Hedger came and asked if I had decided to write to the Inspector. I said “Yes,” and showed her the letter. She said “No one has reported you.” I said that it did not matter that I had been accused of a serious matter it must be cleared up. She said “Couldn’t you resign and get back into the service in a few months.” I replied “It was a question of my character.” She said “No one wants to make a charge against you,” to which I said “if they have no charge to make they would have to acknowledge it openly.”
On the 29th August an inquiry was held by
43
Inspector Smith when I was charged with “Indecency”. A letter which had been taken from my room by one of the Hedgers was produced by Hedger and shown to Mr Smith. It was written to an acquaintance and was in no way connected with my school work. Three of the senior pupils Ethel Kelly aged 16; William Kelly aged 14 and Edith Kelly aged 12 were absent from the inquiry. Their father told me he had questioned them and that they had told him they had not seen any misconduct on it my part and that therefore he did not wish them mixed up in it. He came to the inquiry himself to tell what they had to say but of course could not be heard. The result of that inquiry was that I was suspended from duty. I then wrote to the Chief Inspector for a fresh inquiry at which these children would be able to give evidence.
On the 9th of September previous to my leaving Dalgety I was served with two summonses. I came to Sydney to get legal advice, but on arrival here found my father to be seriously ill, and as he died three days after I was unable to return in time to get the necessary evidence to defend my case at the Dalgety Police Court. I reserved my defence and was accordingly committed for trial at the October Sessions. Morton B Hedger’s charge was tried and the jury returned a verdict of not guilty. The case of Percy Mugridge was tried on the 7th instant and on that charge also a verdict of not guilty was returned. The jury in each case only taking five minutes to arrive at a decision as may be seen from the report in the local papers.
The verdict of two separate juries that I was not guilty of the alleged offences is I submit sufficient answer to the charges of indecent conduct made against me.
As regards the latter complaint of—this letter was only partly written and was taken from my room in its unfinished state. The person into whose hands it fell used it as a means to induce some of the parents to appear against me
44
and it is my firm belief that for the existence of such letter the charge of indecent conduct would never have been trumped up—which I unhesitatingly say they were. The father of the prosecutor Hedger having told two of the parents who had expressed disbelief of the charges—that he—Hedger had a letter which would get me two years.
As the writing of such letter is altogether a thing apart from my duties as a school teacher, and as it has been the cause of all the trouble, anxiety and expense to which myself and family have been subjected I respectfully submit that your Board should recognise I have already suffered enough punishment for my indiscretion in writing it.
I would ask that your Board take into consideration the fact that in country districts the families are constantly meeting in either friendly or business matters, and are chary about taking a decided stand in any matter which may sever such relations. As a consequence when the charges were first mooted some parents who were firmly convinced of my innocence preferred not to allow their children to attend the inquiry thinking the charges would on sighting by the Inspector be found groundless and it was only when they found they had erred in not attending that they rallied round and extricated me from my trouble.
In conclusion I would ask you to refer to Mr Inspector Smith for a report as to the manner in which the two principal witnesses Mugridge and Hedger gave their evidence at the last trial. The first named—Percy Mugridge—utterly denying any misconduct until repeatedly reminded of the Crown Prosecutor of what he had told at the Police Court; and the latter Morton Hedger stubbornly denying facts which he had sworn to at the first trial. As the verdict of the jury shows the statements of these witnesses were wholly unworthy of credence, and when it is considered
45
that of eight witnesses against me six are related to each other while the other two are members of the Hedger family of whom there were two others attending the school—who—as admitted by their father—had never seen any misconduct on my part. I take it that the verdict of the juries in the two trials has obtained the object sought by my viz the clearing of my character and which could not have been brought about satisfactorily by any other means.
I therefore ask that your Board will consider the above facts as a satisfactory answer to the charges made against me and that it will see fit to remove the suspension placed upon me and thus confirm the verdict of the juries as the view taken by your Board of the alleged misconduct.
I have the honor to be
Sir
Yours obediently
[Signed] Edward B Quinn
JW Holliman,
Secretary,
PSB.
1 Freeman’s Journal, (Syd, NSW), Sat 2 Nov 1889, p. 14.
2 The Cooma Express, Fri 7 Oct 1904, p. 2.
3 The Manaro Mercury and Cooma and Bombala Advertiser, Fri 7 Oct 1904, pp. 2, 3.
4 The Sydney Morning Herald, Fri 7 Oct 1904, p. 3. Emphasis added.
5 The Daily Telegraph, Sat 8 Oct 1904, p. 10. Emphasis added.
6 The Cooma Express, Fri 9 Dec 1904, p. 2. Emphasis added.
7 The Manaro Mercury and Cooma and Bombala Advertiser, Fri 9 Dec 1904, p. 2. Emphasis added.
8 The Sydney Morning Herald, Fri 9 Dec 1904, p. 8. Emphasis added.
9 The Sydney Morning Herald, Mon 26 Dec 1904, p. 6.
10 Queanbeyan Age, Fri 30 Dec 1904, p. 2.
11 SRNSW: NRS3829, [5/17190.1], School files, Numbla. Emphasis added.